Is 2011 the year?

The year that we make the distinction between disabled and fat?

Probably not.

This website represented in a picture

I have had several people email me this work of art over the past few months. It seems to represent the craziness that we discuss here in one, simple picture.

If you know who created this, please let me know so I can give proper credit.



Note the simplistic brilliance:

• Fast food
• God reference (God bless AMERICA reference, because America...as you all know...is his chosen country)
• Litter
• A morbidly obese person on a scooter
• Oil stains from a huge, gas-guzzling SUV (ok, I am assuming)

The only thing missing is cigarette butts, or the morbidly obese person smoking a cigarette himself! I'll let that slide though, because the artist put the central figure in a superhero costume which is thought-provoking.

Well done!

They're taking away our rights!

San Francisco voted to ban restaurants from handing out toys with meals that fail to meet basic nutritional standards for fat, calories, and sodium (for example, McDonald's can't put a toy in an "unhealthy" happy meal). Last month, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg appealed to the U.S. Department of Agriculture requesting support for a new initiative that prohibits the use of food stamps for purchasing beverages with added sugar.

And people are going CRAZY in protest.

In case you haven't noticed, childhood obesity is a major problem today. According to the CDC, childhood obesity has more than tripled in the past 30 years with children aged 6 to 11 years increasing from 6.5% in 1980 to 19.6% in 2008, and adolescents aged 12 to 19 years increasing from 5.0% to 18.1%. If parents will not take responsibility to feed their children properly, then government should oversee and mandate the process. It is not "taking away rights", it is preventing child abuse. And from a bigger picture perspective, it will hopefully stem the societal burden we are forced to accept in order to care for these people who - most likely - will not be able to contribute as functioning members of society.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think withholding the toy from a happy meal will make a dent in the problem. But as a wise man once said, baby steps in the right direction are better than standing still.

As far as the outrage about mandating that government aid cannot be used to buy unhealthy crap - give me a break. If I am paying taxes to help you (which I gladly do, because I realize that people often try their best but still need help), then you damn sure need to use my money to sustain yourself in a healthy manner and not make yourself LESS likely to "get back on your feet" one day.

It is time to end all this politically correct nonsense. It is not "mean" to point out people that refuse to step up and take personal responsibility for themselves or the care of their children. If their actions did not ultimately affect us as a society, I would understand the argument. But their actions DO ultimately affect us as a society, whether in the form of increased taxes, increased healthcare costs, or simply taking the focus off of real disabilities that need our attention and are not the result of laziness, stupidity, and ignorance.

Sources:
Happy Meal Ban (POLL): Food Police or Protector?
New York attempts to ban use of food stamps for soda
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Childhood Obesity

Fearing for our future...

I am stopped at a red light, and there is a rather large (I am being kind, she was morbidly obese) woman on the sidewalk parallel to my car. She is trying to pick something up off the ground, but cannot bend all the way down to get it.

What is on the ground?



She must have dropped the package before I glanced over. Skinny people are becoming a minority. It will cost us all - one way or another - in the long run.

Do you really need 64 ounces of anything?

Especially when you are - how can I say this delicately - somewhat overweight?

Moderation - it's not just a word in the dictionary.

Child abuse

This photo has been floating around the Internet for a while (I am not sure who to give credit to). It is difficult to decide what to talk about first:

1.) The child in morbidly obese.
2.) The child is too old to be in a stroller - it is robbed of whatever chance it has to burn off a few calories. Then again, it could very well be in the stroller because it cannot muster the energy to walk very far (due, of course, to the substantial weight problem).
3.) The morbidly obese child, in the stroller, is eating ice cream.
4.) The mother is also morbidly obese.

This isn't funny, it is sad. And I can't think of one single reason this child should not be taken from its parents and the parents put in jail for child abuse.

Yes, we should make it more comfortable to be fat...

"The average size person has increased dramatically over the last century."

"The only toilet in the world for big people."

Shoot me. In the head.